heywood innovation blog

So you’ve applied your strategic and creative genius to launch new employer branding activities, but then the CEO asks you to report on the ROI! How do you do this? How do you go about measuring ROI? It’s not easy to measure. You can for example engage a talented copy writer to improve your job ads and measure the number of responses, but this has little to do with building a strong and sustainable employer brand. Most metrics are likely to be linked to tactics or one-off campaign activities, not real employer branding. So what is involved? Here are a few pointers to start you on your journey…

Employee engagement
A good measure of ROI are the levels of employee engagement before and after the employer branding activities kicked in. By surveying the workforce before and after the activities you will be able to identify how effective they were, which ones hit the mark and which ones didn’t, and refine them accordingly.

Length of service/retention
This cannot be calculated in the short term. If length of service figures are increasing then it’s fair to say that the new EB activities may be driving higher levels of engagement and that employees have a new found higher regard for their employer and the employment experience.

Customer service
Are customer surveys highlighting new levels of satisfaction with the sales experience, the purchasing experience, the order processing experience, the delivery experience and the after sales experience? Were they greeted with a new found smile and a thank you? Are sales figures increasing?

Ideas and recommendations from employees
Are employees suddenly forthcoming with new ideas on how they can do their job better, save on production times, increase team performance and satisfaction, or ways to enhance the customer experience?

Cost per hire
Are you receiving more speculative applications from job seekers? Is this allowing you to reduce your reliance on advertising and external recruiters?

Job applications
Are applicants better empowered with information and an understanding of the job for which they are applying and the career opportunity? Is it because you now have a more compelling and informative Careers section on your website or are other improvements responsible? Are more job seekers visiting the website and, if so, are they the right ones? Are your job ads better written, more informative and more inspiring?

Higher productivity
Are production figures rising without additional resources? Do employees in the production area seem happier with their work and are they putting in a bigger effort?

Referral rates
Are you receiving more ‘better fit’ job applications from people who have been referred by your employees?

Internal engagement
Are present employees more engaged with their work, their colleagues and with managers? Do they have a smile on their face? Has their behaviour shifted to one where collaboration is the norm?

Living the brand
How well is the organisation’s brand being emotionally received and lived by employees? Are they willing to defend and promote it to customers, colleagues, friends and new job applicants? Do they do this ‘from the heart’? Are they ambassadors for the brand, who instill a positive perception in the minds of customers?

Moving forward
Are employees keen to engage with personal development programmes, training programmes and do so willingly? Do they perceive the benefits flow through on personal, work, career and organisational levels?

Offer:accept ratio
Has this improved? If you previously had a 4:1 offer:accept rate, but now have a 3:1 rate, then you can reasonably say the EB activities are taking effect.

Recruitment campaign effectiveness
Are more people responding to your recruitment campaigns? Are they perceiving a more compelling offer? Does the campaign look more attractive and have stronger messages? Is it achieving more ‘cut-through’?

Employer of choice
Have employees since achieved greater clarity on what the organisation is, what it does, what it stands for… and how the employment experience it provides can benefit their career, job satisfaction and lifestyle requirements?

So do you think after your investigations you’ll be armed with sufficient data and feedback to look your boss in the eyes and tell him/her with great conviction that the organisation’s investment in building a strong employer brand has paid off? I hope so.

Tony Heywood is a Fellow of the Design Institute of Australia, founder of Heywood Innovation in Sydney and London with affiliates in Melbourne, Gold Coast, Singapore and Mumbai.

If your employees are not living the organisation’s brand values internally then it’s going to be next to impossible to build the brand externally.

It’s surprising how much money and effort organisations put into building and promoting external brands when things just aren’t right on the inside. When culture is fragmented across different areas of the business. When employees just don’t have a clear view of the road ahead or who’s driving the organisation. When employee disengagement starts to spread because the organisation forgot how to challenge or reward them. When recruitment campaigns fail to get a result. When sales volumes start to dip because enthusiasm and belief for the organisation’s products and services just aren’t there any more. When change moves employees out of their traditional comfort zones and brings on stress and discomfort. When efforts to communicate with employees fall on deaf ears.

Organisations are switched on these days to identifying the warning signs but tend to experience significant difficulty when it comes to finding solutions.

Most branding consultants are inexperienced when it comes to thinking strategically and creatively to identify employee-related issues and finding ways to prescribe solutions – ones which, in many cases, significantly affect the future wellbeing of the organisation. Consulting firms tend to focus on business processes and the bottom line. Employer branding consultants like Heywood Innovation however, focus on employee-related issues and opportunities and how the organisation is perceived as a competent and attractive employer from both the inside and the outside.

Which one did you go for?

Tony Heywood is a Fellow of the Design Institute of Australia, founder of Heywood Innovation in Sydney and London with affiliates in Melbourne, Gold Coast, Singapore and Mumbai.

Employees come in all shapes and sizes but mainly fall into three categories when it comes to their levels of engagement with their employer and their job.

You have the engaged ones who are just what an employer needs – co-operative, committed, loyal and hopefully don’t ask for too high a salary. They’re just a delight to have around – they tend to be innovative, and confident enough to make decisions on their own, are creative and just love their boss. Their fellow workers tend to be stimulated by their enthusiasm which leads to higher productivity. They have a profound connection to their employer and understand the value of the company brand and all it stands for. They value the experience they are gaining from being employed.

Then you have the somewhat disengaged ones who are only in it for the money and are biding their time until a better opportunity comes their way. Often semi-comatose, they do what they’re told but not much more. They don’t smile or laugh much and tend to go home on the dot. They put in minimal effort, keep quiet most of the time, even with their fellow employees, and don’t go out of their way to do a better job. They can have a chip on their shoulder, believing they are in the wrong job or in the wrong industry.

Then at the bottom of the pile are the actively disengaged employees. These are the ones you wish weren’t your employees. They represent the ‘cancer spreading through the organisation’ or the ‘one bad apple’. They tend to display a negative attitude to most things, cause internal rifts and disrupt harmony. These employees undermine what their engaged co-workers accomplish. They are keen to complain and criticise and take delight when others follow suit. Fellow employees tend to go out of their way to avoid them.

A typical breakdown of a workforce would comprise:

• 25 – 30% engaged employees
• 55 – 60% somewhat disengaged employees
• 15% or less actively disengaged employees

Even though it has been calculated that most organisations only experience ‘active disengagement’ in around 15% or less of their workforces, the effects can be very disproportionate and go beyond workforce disruption right to the bottom line.

Gallup’s five year study of employee beliefs and actions determined that disengaged employees were costing US businesses US$300 billion annually in lower productivity and performance.

The Gallup Management Journal’s semi-annual Employee Engagement Index reports that 29% of US employees are ‘actively engaged’, 54% ‘not engaged’, while 17% ‘are ‘actively disengaged’.

Actively disengaged employees are often the most difficult problems to fix or eliminate. They rarely want to change and tend to sabotage management’s efforts to confront the situation. This is where the superstar from HR comes to the rescue. Sometimes, however, they go willingly, feeling relieved that ‘finally it’s all over’ and they have been released.

There is no getting away from the fact that workplace relationships are personal. Employees need to relate well with others to foster an harmonious working environment. Any disruption to the dynamics that support these relationships will have far-reaching consequences. Disengagement must be identified quickly before it has time to take hold and multiply. When was the last time you engaged an employee engagement survey?

Tony Heywood is a Fellow of the Design Institute of Australia, founder of Heywood Innovation in Sydney Australia with affiliates in Melbourne, Gold Coast, London, Singapore and Mumbai.
tony@heywood.com.au
www.heywood.com.au